Share via Email This article is over 6 years old The UK has issued a direct challenge to China and Russia over regulation of the internet, with William Hague insisting that cyberspace must not be "stifled by government control or censorship". In a strongly worded opening address to an international conference hosted in Londonthe foreign secretary told delegates that the internet "must remain open and not become ghettoised" — rebuffing the notion that new international treaties were needed to police online activity. Hague told delegates that cyberspace should not be "subject to separate rules and processes in different regions set by isolated national services, with state-imposed barriers to trade, commerce and the free flow of information and ideas". This, he said, would be deeply counter-productive.
The global nature and the reach of the Internet pose difficulties in controlling content that have never come up with other mediums for communicating and disseminating information. Some countries already censor parts of the Internet, blocking websites and shutting down social media services like Twitter in times of unrest.
However, the Internet can be censored in such a way that it remains a good source of information and a lively social space while protecting those who are most vulnerable to Internet exploitation.
Those last four words are key; porn has always been an exploitative industry, and the Internet has only made it worse.
At one level there is the exploitation of adults, men and women, who may have been coerced into appearing in porn clips for any number of reasons. One of these is the proliferation of amateur porn.
Too often, clips of people are uploaded without their knowledge or consent. The two worst problems concern sex trafficking and child pornography.
Child pornography is a particularly big problem on the Internet, and unfortunately pedophiles are now literally able to network in a way they never have in the past. While both sex trafficking and child pornography are already illegal, the Internet provides a whole new world of profit and distribution for those behind these crimes.
Do the rights of people to freely surf the Internet trump the rights and protections due to children and victims of sex trafficking? A number of Internet sites exist simply to promote hatred of different types of people.
Once upon a time, a racist might have been isolated or only had contact with other people in the immediate community. Now, a disgruntled person nursing racist tendencies can go online and have those fanned into full-fledged hatred.
Future terrorists can be made and recruited online as well, too. This is an issue of exploitation as well. In the past, an angry, alienated young person might pass through such a phase more or less unscathed.
Today, angry young people go online and find people who are waiting to prey upon them and convince them to direct that disillusionment toward hate and terrorist activities. Both so-called home-grown and foreign terrorists can be nurtured in this way.
Does anyone in the world really benefit from an Internet that allows sites to spew racism and hatred toward other types of people? Whose rights are being preserved here? Many people may imagine that such people as artists and writers would be wholly in favor of a free and open Internet, but the truth is that people who create movies, music, books and more are hurt by an uncensored Internet.
Every year, pirates get more and more clever about skirting national and international laws and distributing intellectual content illegally. People may think of piracy as something that only hurts big companies like movie studios, but individuals are hurt by it as well.
Many on the other side of this issue claim that information should be free, but they forget that real people are taking time out of their lives to create that information.
Furthermore, the work creative people do belongs to them in the same way any other possession belongs to a person. Again, the right of people to have a free and open Internet does not take precedence over the right of creators to own and distribute their creations.
Censoring is a word that frightens many people, but if applied in a thoughtful, measured way that is in accordance with community standards, censoring the Internet can protect vulnerable populations including children from sexual exploitation, reduce hate crimes and terrorism and better protect intellectual property.
Censoring the Internet will make both the Internet and the world a better place.There are some truths that I strive to preach, for lack of a better word, in today's information-culture wars propagated in our corrupt mainstream media.
We should not censor or limit internet access as there are simple solutions for common counterarguments.
Internet censorship or even outright banning of internet has become a source of great debate and controversy in recent years. Why We Shouldn't Censor the Internet Essay - The use of censorship by one side to gain power over another is apparent throughout history.
The development of technology has posed several issues for both parties, both making censorship more and less difficult to enforce. This essay aims to provide a clear insight into why government censorship of the internet would be in stark violation of citizen’s freedom of speech, freedom of information, would cripple the internet’s security as well as one America’s largest economies.
Should the Internet be censored? Should the Internet be censored? This is a sticky question; no matter what answer you give to this question there will always be a valid argument in response to your answer. There are lots of arguments in the answer I found doing the research I did.
The United States is not the only country with this problem. A final reason the Internet should be censored is due to violations of intellectual property rights. Many people may imagine that such people as artists and writers would be wholly in favor of a free and open Internet, but the truth is that people who create movies, music, books and more are hurt by an uncensored Internet.